N&O Obama and Basnight make history

I was in line to cast my early ballot in Manteo on Tues. and looked up to see one of the names on the ballot in the flesh. No not Barack but Basnight, Marc and his daughters came in to vote around 3pm. Under the Dome reports the two met at a rally on Wed. in Raleigh and shared some history. Click through for the whole story but here is the punch line:

Basnight, a Manteo Democrat, said he was from Roanoke Island. Obama immediately knew that was the site of the first English settlement in the New World and site of the Wright Brothers' flight.

Senator Basnight replied, "There's a lot of history there, but I got to make history myself yesterday by voting for you."

Ciao

Palin and de Tocqueville in the same post! What do we deserve?

CNN reports that Sarah Palin is accusing Barack Obama of consorting with another radical professor:

Gov. Sarah Palin on Wednesday said Sen. Barack Obama has ties to a Columbia University professor who she said is "a former spokesperson for the Palestinian Liberation Organization."...Palin said her assertion "is not negative campaigning to call someone out on their record."

"It seems that there is yet another radical professor from the neighborhood who spent a lot of time with Barack Obama going back several years," Palin said at an event in Bowling Green, Ohio.

"This is important because his associate, Rashid Khalidi ... in addition to being a political ally of Barack Obama, he's a former spokesperson for the Palestinian Liberation Organization."

Read the story. It surfaced 6 months ago. The two were associates at the U. of Chicago. It sounds sinister. (NOT!!)
I didn't vote for Sarah Palin, I guess if I had I wouldn't have to worry about her knowing a radical professor. In fact I wouldn't have to worry about her knowing a professor of any stripe. Ignorance is bliss!
Remember de Tocqueville said that “in a democracy, the people get the government they deserve." That may never be more true. Go vote!
Ciao

Thoughts on Consolidation circa 1995

I attended an economic summit called by the Dare County Board of Commissioners Monday afternoon. One of the major themes was the wisdom and benefits that would come if the 6 towns would just consolidate their services and eliminate the waste so obvious in the system of having separate governments for each small enclave.
This is not a new issue. It has been around for a long time. Back in 1995 I wrote the letter posted below. I don't think I ever sent it to the Coastland Times. My views haven't changed in the intervening years. If anything I have become more convinced that small government better serves its constituents and is more responsive and efficient. A few more comments after the letter:

To the editor

I am writing this letter as an individual it express my views and this letter should not be viewed as representing the views of the Town of Nags Head Board of Commissioners, of which I am a member.

In a recent column in the Coast ("The future is now on the Outer Banks", March 12, 1995) you discuss a variety of goals developed for the Outer Banks and imply that foremost amongst the elements necessary for the future success of the area is the consolidation of local governments. You state that a unified government would be more efficient and imply that it is better able to provide the community with the quality of life we all want. Your view parallels the conventional wisdom on the subject and as such may benefit from a closer analysis.


The claim reduced costs is the one most often made in calling for consolidation. Taxes can be cut and redundancy eliminated if we all just pulled together is the battle cry. Nothing could be further from the truth. The 5 towns in Dare County all provide varying levels of service to there communities. If you accept that under a consolidated government that no one community would want to reduce its current level of service and that all the areas would expect the same level of service then it is easy to show that costs would increase. Fire protection offers a good example. The Towns of Kitty Hawk and Southern Shores rely almost entirely on dedicated volunteers to provide fire protection while the Towns of Nags Head and Kill Devil Hills have augmented their volunteers with full time paid staff. Extending the same level of paid fire protection to the northern towns would require 10-12 new employees and cost at an absolute minimum $300,000 in salaries alone, quite possibly double that amount. Similar differences exist in other departments as well, extending the level of service offered to a part of the consolidated town to all of the consolidate town will not save money.

The efficiency argument is another questionable claim. If bigger government were better then we would all be praising the federal bureaucracy rather than trying to dismantle it and Washington DC would not be insolvent. Closer to home Dare County, the areas largest government, has no clear edge in providing services. The county recently approached the 5 towns to gauge interest in the county serving as tax collector for all. The town of Manteo has already decided to pursue the idea. On the other hand, analysis of the proposal by the Town of Nags Head showed the town would lose $60,000 by accepting the proposal despite the elimination of personnel. Neither town made the wrong decision, one solution is not always best for all.

Proponents of consolidation also imply that one government will be better able to provide the quality of life we all want on the Outer Banks, again closer examination may debunk this myth. Consider the question of public beach access. The town of Southern Shores has chosen not to provide any while Nags Head and Kill Devil Hills have programs that are models for the rest of coastal North Carolina. If the residents of Southern Shores wanted such a program they would elect leaders who would provide it. They have not. I suspect a unified government would have a hard time convincing the residents of the other towns to accept more visitors on their beaches until similar access was provided in the areas that don't have any. Likewise, the Town of Kitty Hawk is working hard to address the ocean overwash problems in the community. Would voters in the adjoining communities be willing to shell out tax dollars to address this type of local problem? At a national level we are beginning to recognize that the government that is closest to the people is best able to provide services and address the problems of the community. I see little to indicate the reverse is true on the local level.

I am a Commissioner for the Town of Nags Head. I am one of those who you imply are blocking consolidation in order to maintain personal prestige and power. I am very proud of my title but any power I exercise as a member of the Board of Commissioners is exercised for the citizens of the Town of Nags Head. The argument that consolidation is being blocked by petty bureaucrats striving to maintain personal prestige and power is not only wrong it is insulting. The 25 elected leaders in our towns work diligently to find the best course for their respective areas. They serve a public that is seldom responsive and sometimes abusive. They do so because they care and because they want to make the entire area a better place. To imply such crass motives does them a great disservice and is unjustified by their actions.

The towns and County government cooperate in virtually every element of their operations. We share space and equipment, we provide support and expertise for one another. When you see a Nags Head fire truck responding to a call the odds 1in 3 that it is providing mutual aid to a neighboring community as opposed to responding to a fire in the town. By far the largest capital investment the Towns of Nags Head and Kill Devil Hills have is the Regional Water System developed in cooperation with Dare County. Our police, fire and planning departments meet regularly to share information and ideas. Where common interests and activities exist local governments have consistently worked together to provide the best service at the lowest cost. In fact I know of no project that had broad public support that failed because of disagreements among the towns. They worked together with the County and the business community to create the new Dare County Tourism Board. They worked together to get a better solid waste contract for the county. They are currently cooperating with the county in the beach nourishment feasibility study. All are county wide projects and all are ongoing now. Any of the projects you listed could be accomplished under our current framework. In fact the expanded level of discussion and review provided by the extra units ensures full support and consideration when a decision is finally made. Does it make it harder? Absolutely. Getting 5 or 6 boards to agree may seem a daunting proposition. In fact it occurs quite frequently and often without fanfare. The Town of Nags Head is currently improving the police firing range. Funding for this project is coming from the 4 beach towns, all of whom use the facility for police training. This was not reported in your paper, frankly it was not a big deal, just the towns doing what they often do, solving problems jointly.

I do not deny the need for more cooperation. Issues like stormwater runoff, land use planning and ground water quality do not know local boundaries. The decisions of one body impact all. To this end we need to do more joint planning, developing regional approaches to these problems. These very issues are currently being discussed by the Division of Coastal Management because they are true not just for Dare County but for all the regions of the coast and beyond.

The final issue I would like to address is the size of government as it relates to the process of electing leaders. Most candidates for town office campaign by going door to door, neighbor to neighbor seeking support. Few mount extensive media campaigns and few raise large political war chests. A consolidated government would mean an end to that style of election. It would put a premium on fund raising and virtually eliminate close contact with the voters. This raises the question of influence from campaign contributors and reinforces the impact of consolidation on the ability of citizens to influence their government. The current system increases the probability that any citizen will know an elected leader personally. Consolidation will make that a distant memory.
I believe that a consolidated government for the northern beaches of Dare County cannot save money and will by almost definition be less responsive to the needs of the community. There is no problem facing the area now that cannot be solved by cooperation amongst the towns. That has been amply proven already. In short, it's not broken so don't try to fix it.

Some of this is a bit outdated. We have 6 towns now and if anything they are even more intertwined. NH and KDH are planning a fire station. The County does trash and taxes for most of the towns. Yet the arguments still hold. Perhaps the best argument against consolidation is the incorporation of Duck. No one suggested that Southern Shores annex Duck. The 2 towns could not be more different. Duck has its Jazz Festival and concerts in the park. It courts visitors and guests. SS doesn't. The biggest problem is SS is that they can't get their canals dredged (BTW that is a quote from the Mayor of SS). They never met government they liked or wanted. Duck has a PR and Special Events coordinator, a very good one. SS doesn't want to pay for a Fire Dept. Who could imagine these two more different towns. How could they be merged? What would be gained?
Those who believe this is about people defending their small pieces of power and prestige have never held public office or if they have they probably didn't do it well. This is about local control of local services and developement. There is too little prestige and too much hassle in elected service to do it for any reason other than building a better community.
Ciao

Cooperate Yes. Consolidate Never!

OB Sentinel makes late comeback - Pilot 1 - Sentinel 1

When the Virginian Pilot trumped the OB Sentinel I took the local paper to task for inaccurate and in my opinion, incomplete reporting. In a recent editorial the paper responded, noting the mistake and efforts they had made to contact the owner and find out more about his plans. It is unfortunate the owner didn't respond as he did to the Pilot. The Sentinel took note of the debate over legislative mandates for the historic homes in the town:

At the end of the day, the reality is that the property owner has a right to do whatever he wants as long as it is permitted by state and local ordinances and rules. He didn't stop rules from being put into place that would protect the historic district - other property owners over the years have been vocal in their opposition to any rules that would dictate what they can do with their properties.

Unfortunately, some Cottage Row owners haven't realized yet that part of the value of their property is derived by its inclusion in this historic neighborhood only as long as it maintains its original character.

While I believe that there should be rules controling the look of homes in this district and have pursued such rules, it is hard to blame the families who own these cottages for not wanting to add additional rules to the already difficult task of maintaining 100 year old homes. Their point that their part of the town looks great and its the rest of the town that needs to clean up its appearance is difficult to argue with, especially in the face of so little change in the district in the last few 30 or so years. The owners have been doing a pretty good job of protecting the district up to this point. If they decide rules will help or if they can longer protect the district without them then lets adopt rules. Until then I think we need to thank them for their efforts and take the other suggestion that Sentinel made to heart:

If it is possible, now that the local economy is mostly lemons, and things aren't as hectic as they have been for the past several years, maybe it is time for local governments to take time to consider what they want their jurisdictions to look like in 20 years and begin planning for that future - even if it means taking steps to preserve the past.

Ciao

The Debate and the missed opportunty

During last Tuesday night's debate I found myself screaming at the TV screen. Both candidates missed a truly unique opportunity to speak directly to the country through audience and to explain how their administration would deal with the national (or even global) economic meltdown. I found a piece in the New York Times that speaks to this missed opportunity. The author contrasts Obama to Bill Clinton in '92. Patrick Healy makes the point the Obama is not comfortable with the human side of campaigning. He is not Bill Clinton who had an enormous ability to connect with the public on an individual level. Obama and McCain both spent more time talking about each other than about what they would do upon taking office. Particularly for Obama the answer is not hard, its natural. All he needed to say was:

Within the first 100 days I will send congress a tax package that will lower taxes on the middle class providing the funds they need to keep our economy growing, Within the first 100 days I will send a congress and engery plan that will invest $100 billion dollars in the development of alternative energy sources to break our dependence on foreign oil and slow global climate change. This investment will create thousands of new jobs and create new American technologies that we can export to the rest of the world. Finally within the first 100 days I will send to Congress a health care plan that will provide millions of American families the same health insurance options the Senator McCain and I enjoy. This plan will reduce medical costs, save middle class families thousands of dollars while improving health care in this country. These 3 programs combined with the rescue and investment programs currently being rolled out will strengthen our economy and lead us out of the the economic collapse brought on the by the failed polices of the last 8 years of Republican leadership.

How hard is that. You know the plans you know the numbers and frankly this is what the American voter needs to hear, not how many times McBama voted for something he didn't really vote for. Both parties are guilty. I support Obama so I hold him to a higher standard. Healy suggests some reasons for Obama's performance:

At a time of real financial turmoil for so many Americans, is there really not much desire for a feel-your-pain politician? At the town hall debate Tuesday night, Mr. Obama largely stuck to facts, figures, and programmatic detail as he talked about the economy and domestic issues. He didn’t take advantage of the town hall format to show a bit of leg, humanity-wise. It was enough to make anxious voters feel a little lonely, whereas Mr. Clinton would have offered a psychic hug.

“Obama did not vary his tone of voice at all — it’s one of his main problems in connecting,” said Ruth Sherman, a political communications consultant. “It is a beautiful voice, with lots of highs and lows of pitch, but the general tone is always the same. There is much, much more he could do, just with his voice, to increase his impact.”

“Most of the time, too, Obama pivoted to his stump speech, missing opportunity after opportunity to connect with the audience and beyond,” she added. “I can’t get over this. Why isn’t he making more of an effort? Perhaps he’s doing well and just biding his time, figuring that he just has to do O.K.? These are leadership skills, and they cannot be dismissed.”

The reviews for Mr. McCain’s performance were not stellar, either, yet it was Obama supporters who were hoping that their man would go on the offensive and create some theater by trouncing Mr. McCain.

I will vote for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. I will tell you why in another post. I only hope that he offers us more leadership and less negativity at a time when we all need to hear that there is hope in someplace other than Arkansas.

Ciao

PS. What he said. See Tom Friedman's view of Sarah Palin in the NYT. He says what I think only better. If you think this is somehow the liberal media's bias against conservatives then tell me who should pay for Palin and Biden's sons' body armour!

Va Pilot 1 - OB Sentinel 0

With the start of the League Championship series today (GO Phillies!), I guess I am thinking about keeping score. Score one for Katherin Kozak at the Va. Pilot who got the story right about the destruction of the Winslow Cottage in Nags Head Historic Cottage Row District. Kate talked to owner Rob Morris and got his side of the story and presented an article that represented his intentions fairly.
Compare that Pilot article to the hatchet piece in the Sentinel on the same subject. The writer made no apparent attempt to contact Morris instead relying on statements by former Manteo Mayor and historic property owner John Wilson. John has a lot of good ideas about the historic district but he doesn't know what Rob Morris is planning. The Sentinel article even misidentified the cottage as one formerly owned by Buddy Davis. In fact Morris bought the Winslow cottage which will be destroyed and the Davis cottage which will be kept. The sentinel left Morris's plans vague saying only that He plans to build a larger multi-bedroom structure in its place.
In fact Rob Morris will build a larger structure but he will do it as a recreation of the existing structure with as much original material as possible.
Lets hope Rob does what he says he will do. I believe him and I respect his desire to do the right thing. I can't respect reporters who misrepresent the news and can't even get the story right.
Ciao